Prostate cancer up close: what do we know, and what do we still need to understand?

Some prostate tumours can be monitored for years. Others need treatment. We look at how research at the PRBB helps tell them apart and sheds light on how each decision can affect patients’ lives.

Close-up of a hand holding a light blue ribbon in front of a white coat.

The light blue ribbon is a symbol of prostate cancer awareness.

What can we tell about a tumour when we detect it? Why are some harder to treat than others? And what does a patient tell us when we ask how they are doing twenty years after treatment? This November, to mark Movember, we look back at five years of research in which teams from the research centres at the Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB) have helped answer these questions.

Key points

  • Family history and age help us understand prostate cancer risk. Researchers are also studying the role of the environment, but an association does not show that an exposure causes the disease.
  • A single prostate can contain several tumour foci with different molecular features. This makes it harder to predict how the disease will progress and helps explain why researchers are looking for new biomarkers.
  • To assess a treatment, we need to know how well it controls the disease and what changes in the daily lives of the people who receive it. Some effects can still be seen up to twenty years later.

What influences the risk of developing prostate cancer?

The risk of developing prostate cancer increases with age and is higher in people with a family history of the disease. Part of this predisposition can be studied using polygenic risk scores, which combine information from many genetic variants. To interpret a score, however, we need to know what values are typical in a reference population.

Arcadi Navarro, head of the Evolutionary Genomics group at the Institute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE, CSIC-UPF), helped interpret the results of a study published in 2025 in the European Journal of Human Genetics. The team used genomic data from 2.190 people of Spanish ancestry to build reference distributions for more than 3.000 scores. These include scores for prostate cancer as well as many other diseases and traits. The atlas shows where a score falls within the population distribution, but it does not validate a test for predicting who will develop the disease.

Understanding risk also means looking at the environment, which calls for different tools. Cristina M. Villanueva, a researcher at the Mar Campus of the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), is one of the authors of a study on nitrates in drinking water, published in 2023 in Environmental Health Perspectives. The study, with Carolina Donat-Vargas as first author, is part of MCC-Spain, an epidemiological study involving several research centres. The team reconstructed participants’ exposure from where they had lived and the type of water they drank. Comparing 697 cases with 927 controls, they found that a higher estimated intake of nitrates from drinking water was associated with a greater likelihood of prostate cancer. The association was stronger for aggressive tumours.

In another MCC-Spain study, published in 2026 in Environmental Research, Manolis Kogevinas, affiliated with the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) and the Hospital del Mar Research Institute (HMRIB), and Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, from ISGlobal, collaborated with a team from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. An association with prostate cancer, particularly advanced disease, was found when arsenic was measured in toenails, but not when it was measured in urine. The two types of sample may reflect different periods of exposure. As with nitrates, the findings point to a possible link that warrants further investigation. Neither study establishes that these exposures cause prostate cancer.

Detecting a tumour does not always tell us how it will progress

PSA, or prostate-specific antigen, is a protein that can be measured with a blood test. A raised PSA level can be a sign of cancer, but it can also occur when the prostate is enlarged for benign reasons. European guidelines on prostate cancer place PSA testing within a wider assessment that also considers whether an MRI scan and a biopsy are needed. If a tumour is confirmed, its grade and stage help guide the decision. The grade describes how different the cells look from normal cells under the microscope, while the stage describes how far the tumour has spread. For some low-risk, localised tumours, this may mean opting for active surveillance and reserving treatment for when there are signs of progression.

The sample that is analysed, however, does not always tell the whole story. Silvia Hernández-Llodrà and Josep Lloreta-Trull designed and supervised a study on this question, with Laura Segalés as first author. All three list the Department of Medicine and Life Sciences at Pompeu Fabra University (MELIS-UPF) as an affiliation. Lloreta-Trull and Nuria Juanpere, a co-author, also list the Department of Pathology at Hospital del Mar. In a study published in the 2024 volume of Virchows Archiv, they analysed five proteins in samples from 185 cases. In 69 cases with more than one tumour focus, they were able to compare the dominant focus with a secondary one. In some cases, the two foci had different molecular profiles.

Some patterns were associated with an earlier rise in PSA after treatment, a sign known as biochemical recurrence. A rise in PSA does not necessarily mean that the cancer has spread.

Illustration of a prostate with two tumour foci that can have different molecular profiles. The team analysed 185 cases and compared two foci from the same prostate in 69 of them.

The question of how far a tumour has spread also arises during surgery. Lluís Fumadó, a urologist at Hospital del Mar and a collaborating researcher at HMRIB, coordinated a European trial on sentinel lymph node detection, published online in 2023 in European Urology Focus. Fumadó and José María Abascal also list MELIS-UPF as an affiliation. The probe helped locate at least one of the first lymph nodes to receive drainage from the tumour in all 27 patients assessed. Finding one of these nodes, however, does not rule out the presence of tumour cells in other nodes. The trial primarily assessed how well the probe worked.

From DNA to RNA, what can the tumour’s biology tell us?

One way to understand these differences is to study what happens to the genes involved in DNA repair. Laura Segalés and Silvia Hernández-Llodrà, from MELIS-UPF and HMRIB, worked with colleagues from HMRIB’s Urological Cancer Research Group (GRECU), coordinated by Joaquim Bellmunt, to analyse 121 primary tumours in a study published in 2025 in Laboratory Investigation. They found that loss of copies of PARP1 and gain of copies of PARP2, two genes involved in DNA repair, were associated with features of more aggressive disease. Tumours with a gain in PARP2 copy number alone had the shortest time to a further rise in PSA.

In a 2026 study in Molecular Biology Reports, Segalés and Hernández-Llodrà and other members of the group found that the relationship between another marker, ETS2, and the time until PSA rose again varied depending on how the p53 protein was detected in the samples. Both studies point to potential prognostic markers, or clues to how the disease might progress. Whether they provide enough information to guide decisions in clinical practice remains to be seen. Meanwhile, GRECU has completed a project on the role of PARP1 and PARP2 in metastatic hormone-sensitive cancer, supported by the Asociación Española de Urología.

But the DNA sequence is only part of the story. When a cell copies a gene into RNA, it can join the pieces it keeps in different combinations. This process, known as alternative splicing, allows a single gene to produce different versions of RNA.

Malgorzata Rogalska and Juan Valcárcel, both from the Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), contributed to a study on the regulation of splicing, published in 2026 in Nature. The team showed that polyamines, molecules that cells naturally produce, can alter how RNA is processed by protecting parts of the proteins involved. The models included human prostate cancer cells. The findings explain a link between metabolism and gene regulation, but do not show that the mechanism can be used to treat the disease.

When does combining treatments help?

Many prostate tumours rely on signals from androgens, hormones such as testosterone, to grow. In advanced disease, these hormones can be reduced or their signals blocked. If the tumour progresses even though testosterone remains at very low levels, the cancer is described as castration-resistant.

Alejo Rodríguez-Vida, an oncologist at Hospital del Mar and a researcher in GRECU at HMRIB, co-authored the final PEACE-3 results, published in 2026 in Annals of Oncology. The international phase III trial, coordinated by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), studied patients with metastatic castration-resistant disease and bone metastases. Median survival was 38,2 months with enzalutamide and radium-223, and 32,6 months with enzalutamide alone. However, high-grade adverse events were also more common with the combination.

Rodríguez-Vida also contributed to ZZ-FIRST, published in 2026 in Nature Medicine. This phase II trial, conducted at eight centres in Spain and sponsored by MEDSIR, included 54 patients with extensive metastatic disease that was still sensitive to hormone treatment. Both groups received androgen deprivation therapy. Adding talazoparib to enzalutamide met the PSA response threshold set as the primary endpoint. However, the comparison between groups was exploratory and did not establish a clear additional clinical benefit. High-grade toxicity was also more common with the combination. The two trials looked at different situations. ZZ-FIRST illustrates why a PSA response alone does not establish a benefit for patients.

What is life like twenty years after treatment?

An outcome that matters to a patient can be as simple as being able to sleep again without getting up several times to urinate. Other changes affect continence, sexual function or bowel symptoms. Questionnaires that patients fill in allow researchers to study these effects directly and see whether they change over time.

Víctor Zamora, Olatz Garin and Montse Ferrer, from the Health Services Research Group at HMRIB, and their colleagues used these questionnaires in a study published in 2024 in Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology. They compared the first two years of active surveillance, robotic surgery, intensity-modulated external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, a technique that delivers radiation from within the prostate. The pattern of symptoms differed between groups. Robotic surgery was associated with more urinary incontinence than active surveillance, while bowel symptoms were more common in the radiotherapy and brachytherapy groups.

In another study, published in 2025 in European Urology Open Science, Zamora, Garin and Ferrer followed a separate cohort of patients with localised cancer for up to twenty years after treatment. Some differences persisted to the end of follow-up. Urinary incontinence had worsened more among patients who had undergone open surgery, while sexual function had declined less in the brachytherapy group. Because treatments were not assigned at random, some of the differences may reflect how the groups differed at the outset. These findings do not show that one treatment is better for everyone, but they help patients ask more specific questions before making a decision.

With this in mind, the research project on shared decision-making led by Montse Ferrer at HMRIB, funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and the Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, has led to an app that is being tested to help patients consider treatment options with their medical team. The team has also contributed to TrueNTH, an international registry of prostate cancer outcomes funded by Movember, which makes it possible to study quality of life and care across countries.

Find out more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *