Predicting protein stability with simple maths

Until now, it was thought that multiple mutations could interact with each other, enhancing or suppressing each other’s effects. However, research from CRG has shown that this is a rare phenomenon.

calculator

A collaboration between CRG and the Sanger Institute has demonstrated that the effect of mutations on protein structure can be predicted with much simpler calculations than previously assumed. Picture by Myriams-Fotos from Pixabay.

Each and every protein in our body is made up of amino acid chains. When one of these amino acids undergoes a mutation, the entire protein can be affected, often marking the difference between health and disease. This happens because the structure of the protein changes, which can impair its function. However, experimentally measuring how different mutations affect the structure and function of a protein is impossible due to the vast number of combinations to test. For example, in a protein made up of 34 amino acids, there are 17 billion different combinations if only a single change is allowed at each position. And most human proteins are much larger than this.

Until recently, it was assumed that one mutation could often affect another mutation, increasing or suppressing its effects. Now, a study by the Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) in collaboration with the Wellcome Sanger Institute has found that interactions between mutations are less common than previously thought. This means that most mutations affect a protein independently.

The discovery that mutations usually do not interact with each other implies that protein stability is affected by mutations following much simpler rules than previously assumed. The research team, led by André Faure and Ben Lehner, analyzed protein sequences with different combinations of mutations and tested their stability. The experimental result closely matched models that calculated the overall effect of mutations as a simple sum, considering them independent. However, the model was able to predict the protein’s structure if it had less than three mutations.

“We’ve seen that we don’t need supercomputers to predict a protein’s behavior; simple measurements and maths will suffice.”

Ben Lehner (CRG and Wellcome Sanger Institute)

Nevertheless, some level of experimental validation is still required to confirm predictions, especially for critical applications such as drug development, where unexpected effects or rare interactions may not be captured by the models. But this research will help optimize the number of experiments needed to analyze and predict protein structures, which represents a step forward in designing proteins with pharmaceutical and biotechnological potential.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *